U.S. Stablecoin Bill Faces Delay as Banking Groups Seek More Time

Banking industry groups have asked U.S. regulators for additional time to submit comments on a proposed stablecoin framework tied to the GENIUS Act, a request that could push back the timeline for finalizing new rules governing digital dollar-pegged tokens.

The request centers on a notice of proposed rulemaking published by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation related to the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework. Banking groups have argued that the complexity of the proposed rules warrants a longer comment window than initially provided.

Why Banks Say the Comment Period Is Too Short

The GENIUS Act, formally known as the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, would create a federal licensing and oversight framework for stablecoin issuers. It would also define reserve requirements and consumer protection standards for dollar-backed digital tokens.

Banking trade groups contend that the bill’s scope, covering everything from reserve composition to audit obligations, requires more time for thorough legal and compliance review. The concern is that a compressed timeline could lead to comments that fail to address key technical details, particularly around how banks themselves would interact with licensed stablecoin issuers.

CoinTelegraph reported that the request could potentially delay the bill’s implementation, as regulators weigh whether to extend the public comment period before moving forward with final rules.

Where the Bill Stands and What Comes Next

The GENIUS Act has advanced through committee stages in both the U.S. Senate and House, making it one of the furthest-along pieces of crypto-specific legislation in the current congressional session. The FDIC’s notice of proposed rulemaking signals that regulators are already preparing the operational framework that would take effect if the bill becomes law.

If regulators grant an extended comment period, the finalization of implementing rules would shift accordingly. That delay could also affect the timeline for stablecoin issuers seeking federal licenses, as final compliance requirements would remain uncertain until the rulemaking process concludes.

The procedural hold matters because multiple federal agencies, not just the FDIC, would need to coordinate their rulemaking under the GENIUS Act. A delay at the comment stage for one agency could ripple across the broader regulatory calendar, similar to how Coinbase’s effort to shift its prediction markets case to federal court reflects the growing importance of jurisdictional clarity for crypto firms.

What This Means for Stablecoins and Traditional Finance

The banking groups’ involvement underscores how seriously traditional financial institutions are taking stablecoin regulation. Unlike earlier rounds of crypto rulemaking that banks largely watched from the sidelines, the GENIUS Act directly affects whether and how banks can custody stablecoin reserves, issue their own tokens, or partner with non-bank issuers.

For stablecoin issuers like Circle and Paxos, the delay introduces additional uncertainty around compliance planning. Companies that have been building toward a federal licensing regime may need to extend interim arrangements with state regulators while waiting for final federal rules.

The debate also intersects with broader regulatory developments across the crypto sector. As Thailand’s SEC moves to open direct crypto futures access for companies, the U.S. stablecoin framework is being watched internationally as a potential model for how major economies handle digital dollar instruments.

Meanwhile, the recent exploit affecting DeFi platform Volo has reinforced industry arguments that clear regulatory guardrails, particularly for assets like stablecoins that bridge traditional and decentralized finance, are overdue.

The next concrete milestone will be whether the FDIC and other agencies formally extend the comment deadline. If they do, final rules under the GENIUS Act could slip into late 2026, leaving stablecoin oversight in a holding pattern through much of the year.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.