Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers Impose New Account Restrictions

Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers Impose New Account Restrictions
Key Points:
  • Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers require proof of overseas residency to open accounts for mainland Chinese residents.
  • Changes align with updated regulatory directives from Chinese authorities.
  • Both firms’ shares initially dropped, but they have mechanisms to alleviate the impact on their business.

Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers have restricted new account openings in China, requiring overseas residency proof, following regulatory directives.

This policy impacts traditional brokerage markets, reflecting regulatory tightening, but has no immediate effect on major cryptocurrency or DeFi markets.

Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers have imposed new restrictions on opening accounts for mainland Chinese residents, requiring proof of overseas residency. These changes come in response to updated regulatory directives from Chinese authorities. The trend aligns with previous regulatory adjustments in the financial sector.

Futu Holdings Ltd., parent of Futubull and Moomoo, and UP Fintech Holding Ltd., running Tiger Brokers, have adjusted their onboarding processes. Accounts can now only be opened with a non-mainland Chinese ID or proof of overseas permanent residency. Such measures impact new client acquisition strategies.

Customer Service, Futu Securities, “The company is currently undergoing a system upgrade and only supports account opening by customers with Hong Kong or Macao ID cards. After the system upgrade, customers can open an account using a mainland ID card combined with overseas permanent residency identification.”

The immediate effect of these changes is primarily felt in China’s traditional brokerage sector, as investor unease caused share prices of both firms to drop initially. Futu’s shares fell by 4%, while Tiger Brokers experienced a 7% decline. However, both companies have mechanisms to cushion their overall business impact.

Financial implications include a downturn in potential growth opportunities in mainland China. However, these companies maintain diversified revenue sources on a global scale. The decision has triggered discussions about regulatory pressures China’s fintech industry faces beyond crypto-specific scrutiny.

Industry analysts monitor the situation closely to gauge broader financial implications. Both firms continue to function in international markets despite these restrictions. The absence of any direct impact on crypto trading or blockchain platforms keeps market activity stable in this segment. Experts anticipate no immediate effect on major cryptocurrency prices or total value locked in protocols tied to these brokerages. Historical trends show China’s regulatory actions typically affect traditional fiat and equity sectors, not cryptocurrency directly. Investor sentiment remains cautious, focusing on compliance strategies.

Share This Article
Exit mobile version