South Korea’s central bank says crypto exchanges should adopt stock-market-style circuit breakers, a step that could limit panic trading after the Bithumb mishap but also signal a much tighter oversight regime for one of Asia’s most active digital-asset markets.
In its 2025 Payment and Settlement Report, released April 13, 2026, the Bank of Korea said crypto exchanges should consider Korea Exchange-style circuit breakers that can pause trading during abnormal transactions or sharp price swings. That moves the idea beyond exchange housekeeping and into a central-bank-backed policy recommendation.
Key Takeaways
- The Bank of Korea wants crypto venues to use Korea Exchange-style trading halts during abnormal transactions or sharp price swings.
- The recommendation follows the Bithumb error that the central bank said exposed weak internal controls, slow detection and missing real-time balance checks.
- South Korea’s market is already moving toward five-minute reconciliation and daily balance disclosure after the same incident.
What South Korea’s Central Bank Is Proposing
The central bank said Bithumb mistakenly distributed 620,000 BTC, or about 60 trillion won, after an employee entered BTC rather than KRW units for what should have been a much smaller payout.
According to the same report, the mistake began at 19:00 on Feb. 6, 2026 when the exchange processed a request that was supposed to be worth roughly 620,000 won. The BOK said Bithumb’s local BTC price briefly fell from 98,000,000 won to 81,000,000 won, and that the swing caused about 1 billion won in user damage through panic selling, stop-losses and forced liquidations.
The same BOK report says 1,788 BTC, or 0.3% of the mistaken distribution had already been sold before recovery efforts finished.
The BOK said Bithumb identified the problem after about 20 minutes and halted customer trading and withdrawals around 19:35 to 19:40, too late to claw back the coins already sold. That sequence is why the report argues for real-time ledger-to-blockchain balance checks and exchange-level brakes instead of relying only on manual controls and after-the-fact remediation.
Why the Proposal Matters for Crypto Oversight
Independent confirmation arrived quickly. The Korea Times’ April 13, 2026 report said the BOK blamed the absence of circuit-breaker-like safeguards and weak internal controls for the market fallout after the Bithumb error. When one operational slip can knock BTC from 98,000,000 won to 81,000,000 won, the central bank is effectively arguing that crypto venues need the same kind of emergency tools used in equities.
That position also places Seoul inside a wider supervisory trend. Europe has been debating tougher market oversight too, as seen in ECB Backs ESMA Crypto Supervision Plan, but the BOK is unusual in tying live trading halts to a single, documented exchange failure.
South Korea matters because regulators are already moving past broad warnings. On April 6, 2026, the Financial Services Commission said exchanges must reconcile internal ledgers against token holdings every five minutes by the end of May, disclose balances daily and submit to monthly external checks after the Bithumb incident. For traders, exchange operations are becoming part of market risk alongside shocks such as Bitcoin Falls as Oil Jumps on US Strait of Hormuz Blockade and the broader turbulence discussed in Iran War Fallout Will Muddy Asset Markets Through 2026: Analyst.
What Comes Next After the Central Bank’s Pitch
For now, the BOK has issued a recommendation rather than an enforceable rule. In the central bank’s April 13, 2026 publication note, it also said lawmakers should reflect stronger exchange controls in the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, which makes the National Assembly and the FSC the next institutions to watch.
One reason the proposal may travel beyond a report footnote is that the BOK said Bithumb later bought replacement BTC externally at 22:42 on Feb. 7, 2026 to cover the mismatch left after the earlier sales. That detail turns the case from a brief trading glitch into a settlement problem with balance-sheet consequences.
The bull case for market participants is that safeguards aimed at a 98,000,000 won to 81,000,000 won air pocket and roughly 1 billion won in user losses could reduce the damage from the next operational error. The bear case for exchanges is that once five-minute reconciliation, daily balance disclosure and monthly external checks are paired with automatic halts, South Korea’s crypto market may become safer but also materially less flexible.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
