XRP Market Analysis: ETF Launches and Supply Stress

XRP Market Analysis: ETF Launches and Supply Stress
Key Takeaways:
  • XRP supply stress with 41.5% held at a loss.
  • ETF inflows fail to stabilize XRP market.
  • Potential for increased selling pressure.

41.5% of XRP’s supply is valued at a loss despite recent price gains and the launch of spot XRP ETFs in November 2025, revealing market instability.

The substantial portion of XRP held at a loss suggests potential market volatility and sell-offs, affecting investor confidence and future prices.

Glassnode’s latest data reveals that 41.5% of XRP’s circulating supply is held at a loss despite recent price gains. Spot XRP ETFs launched, but these developments have not offset the underlying market stress. Key organizations like Glassnode, Canary Capital, and Franklin Templeton are central, with no direct comments from Ripple executives.

The industry observes cautiously as the situation unfolds, impacting market dynamics significantly.

The impact on investors is substantial, leading to unease in the market. XRP price action remains weak, exacerbating concerns about potential sell-offs. No evidence suggests related stress on other cryptocurrencies. The launch of new ETFs has brought institutional flows, yet prices fell further, posing challenges for XRP’s stability. Analysts highlight the risk of potential downward pressure if prices continue to decline.

Market actors remain wary as they assess potential impacts. The ETF launch has not provided the expected stabilization, leaving many investors concerned about future price movements. Historical trends indicate the possibility of price rebounds following such contractor phases, as seen in previous crashes.

However, current conditions require scrutiny, with Glassnode suggesting structural fragility that could precipitate further volatility.

Even though the XRP price is four times higher than $0.53, 41.5% of XRP coins are held at a loss. – Glassnode Analytics Team, Data Analytics Firm, Glassnode, Source
Share This Article
Exit mobile version